CASE RESULTS

Drunk Driver v. Auto

$10,000,000.00 structured settlement for a wrongful death case against the MTA. A twelve year old little girl who lost her mother as a result of a bus running over her..more

Construction Worker Obtains More Than $2.5 Million for Injury

We are pleased to announce that the Los Angeles personal injury law firm of Lederer & Nojima LLP has obtained a judgment of..more

Slip and Fall Accident

On September 9, 2010, Lederer & Nojima LLP was awarded a $2,506,432.76 judgment in a case evolving from a painter..more


View Larger Map
12100 Wilshire Blvd
Suite 480
Los Angeles, CA 90025

View Larger Map
555 W 5th Street
31st Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90013

Google Reviews

Review of Lederer & Nojima LLP

These guys are winners
5 out of 5
by Troy
When I contacted them, I didn't know if I had a case. They made sure that I got great medical care, talked me through the process, and when it was over, got me a settlement that changed my life for the better. I recommend them to everyone.

Lederer & Nojima LLP Google Reviews

5 out of 5 based on 1 reviews.

Reviews for Lederer & Nojima
Review us on Google Places

NTSB Investigation Finds No Corrosion in San Bruno Pipeline Explosion

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

An investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board has not found any signs of external corrosion, dents, or gouges on the pipeline damaged in a deadly explosion in September. Thus far, there is no reason to believe that any external excavation caused the pipeline rupture and explode that night. The explosion killed eight people, and injured dozens of others. Several houses were damaged in the blaze.

While investigators have not found any signs of corrosion, they have found plenty of welding seams. That does stand out, because the company that operated the pipeline, Pacific Gas & Electric has insisted that its pipes were seamless. Los Angeles personal injury lawyers expect more investigations into this aspect, especially as it indicates that PG&E either withheld information, or was simply not aware of the state of its own pipelines.

The NTSB is also looking at inspections conducted by the company on the pipeline, which was built in 1956. The agency investigators are especially looking at why the company conducted less sophisticated inspections of its pipeline, without using high-tech methods, like sending a robot into the pipe.

PG&E had reason to be concerned about that particular stretch of pipeline. That pipeline had been labeled “high risk” in 2007, and PG&E had planned to raise funds for repairs of the pipeline by billing ratepayers. However, those plans were inexplicably dropped the following year.

The NTSB investigators are also looking at why it took crew members of PG&E approximately 90 minutes to shut off the gas supply to the neighborhood the night of the fire.


FREE CASE REVIEW

Note: Labels in bold are required.

Captcha Image

I have read and understand the disclaimer.